<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My blood. It boils.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mamapundit.com/2009/02/my-blood-it-boils/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mamapundit.com/2009/02/my-blood-it-boils/</link>
	<description>motherhood, and all the rest of it.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 19:02:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Feisty411</title>
		<link>http://mamapundit.com/2009/02/my-blood-it-boils/#comment-342</link>
		<dc:creator>Feisty411</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 18:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mamapundit.com/?p=424#comment-342</guid>
		<description>Here is the link to the government of Tennessee page, from there you can find your representatives and send them emails telling them to vote no on this. We can’t just sit back and moan about how wrong this is and not do anything. Also here is a copy of the letter I sent to mine, if you want to just copy and paste it. I included the bill from above so that, hopefully, they will actually read it.

http://www.tennesseeanytime.org/government/elected.html

My body belongs to me! I may not know I’m pregnant, I may not have a car or can aford to go to a doctor several times in nine months. My unborn child may simplely die for no reason, there may be complications for no reason, these things happen. That doesn’t not make me a drug user nor does that give the state the right to treat me as such. Please, for your wife and your daughters and your sisters and neices and all the women of child baring age in the state of Tennessee, vote no on this legislation! 

SB 1065 by Marrero B (HB 0890 by Hackworth)

AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 68, relative to testing for certain substances in pregnant women.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF TENNESSEE:
SECTION 1.Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 68, Chapter 5, is amended by adding Section 2 of this act as a new part thereto. 

SECTION 2.
(a) The general assembly declares that, as a matter of public policy of this state and in
the interest of public health, pregnant women who abuse alcohol and drugs pose a risk to their unborn children. Pregnant women who meet certain criteria, as determined by the department, through rules and regulations duly promulgated in accordance with the provisions of the Uniform Administrative Procedures Act, compiled in title 4, chapter 5, shall be tested for alcohol and drugs in order to encourage them to seek immediate treatment for an alcohol-related or drug-related problem. 

(b) If the department levies a fee or charge for the cost of testing, it shall use the same billing and collection methods normally used by independent private laboratories. Any fee shall be waived for patients who are unable to pay. 

(c) The department, in promulgating rules to implement this act, shall consider the following as indications of the necessity for alcohol or drug testing:
(1) No prenatal care;
(2) Late prenatal care after twenty-four (24) weeks gestation;
(3) Incomplete prenatal care;
(4) Abruptio placentae;
(5) Intrauterine fetal death;
(6) Preterm labor of no obvious cause;
(7) Intrauterine growth retardation of no obvious cause;
(8) Previously known alcohol or drug abuse; or
(9) Unexplained congenital anomalies. 

(d) The commissioner of health is authorized to adopt rules, using criteria established by the United States department of health and human services as guidelines for modeling the drug and alcohol testing program pursuant to this act, concerning, but not limited to:
(1) Standards for licensing drug and alcohol testing laboratories and suspension and revocation of the licenses;
(2) Body specimens and minimum specimen amounts that are appropriate for drug or alcohol testing;
(3) Methods of analysis and procedures to ensure reliable drug or alcohol testing results, including the use of breathalyzers and standards for initial tests and confirmation tests;
(4) Minimum cut-off detection levels for alcohol, each drug or metabolites of the drug for the purposes of determining a positive test result;
(5) Chain-of-custody procedures to ensure proper identification, labeling and handling of specimens tested; and
(6) Retention, storage and transportation procedures to ensure reliable results on confirmation tests and retests. 

(e) Prior to acting on the proposed rules to implement this chapter, the commissioner shall submit the proposed rules to the house health and human resources and the senate general welfare committees of the general assembly for their review and comment. The committees shall have forty-five (45) days to review the proposed rules and transmit any comment it may have to the commissioner. 

(f) Any woman who tests positive for alcohol or drugs on a test administered pursuant to this chapter shall be referred to treatment for an alcohol-related or drug-related problem. Every physician, surgeon or other person permitted by law to attend a pregnant woman during gestation shall report each woman who refuses to seek treatment for an alcohol-related or drug-related problem or who misses two (2) or more appointments to the department of children’s services. Such reports shall be in a manner specified by the department, either by contacting a local representative of the department or by utilizing the department’s centralized intake procedure, where applicable. 

(g) A health care provider who makes a report of alcohol or drug abuse, as required by subsection (f), shall not be liable in any civil or criminal action that is based solely upon such report. 

(h) Nothing in this section shall be construed to confer any immunity upon a health care provider for a criminal or civil action arising out of the treatment of a woman about whom the report of alcohol or drug abuse was made. 

(i) All information, interviews, reports, statements, memoranda and drug or alcohol test results, written or otherwise, received by the covered employer through a drug or alcohol testing program are confidential communications and may not be used or received in evidence, obtained in discovery or disclosed in any public or private proceedings, except in accordance with this section. 

(j) Laboratories, medical review officers, employee assistance programs, drug or alcohol rehabilitation programs and their agents who receive or have access to information concerning drug or alcohol test results shall keep all information confidential. Release of the information under any other circumstance is authorized solely pursuant to a written consent form signed voluntarily by the person tested, unless the release is compelled by a hearing officer or a court of competent jurisdiction pursuant to an appeal taken under this section, relevant to a legal claim asserted by the employee or is deemed appropriate by a professional or occupational licensing board in a related disciplinary proceeding. The consent form must contain, at a minimum:
(1) The name of the person who is authorized to obtain the information;
(2) The purpose of the disclosure;
(3) The precise information to be disclosed;
(4) The duration of the consent; and
(5) The signature of the person authorizing release of the information. 

(k) Information on drug or alcohol test results for tests administered pursuant to this act shall not be released or used in any criminal proceeding against the woman who was subject to the test. Information released contrary to this section is inadmissible as evidence in the criminal proceeding. 

SECTION 3. For the purpose of promulgating rules and regulations, this act shall take effect upon becoming a law, the public welfare requiring it. For all other purposes this act shall take effect January 1, 2010, the public welfare requiring it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is the link to the government of Tennessee page, from there you can find your representatives and send them emails telling them to vote no on this. We can’t just sit back and moan about how wrong this is and not do anything. Also here is a copy of the letter I sent to mine, if you want to just copy and paste it. I included the bill from above so that, hopefully, they will actually read it.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.tennesseeanytime.org/government/elected.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.tennesseeanytime.org/government/elected.html</a></p>
<p>My body belongs to me! I may not know I’m pregnant, I may not have a car or can aford to go to a doctor several times in nine months. My unborn child may simplely die for no reason, there may be complications for no reason, these things happen. That doesn’t not make me a drug user nor does that give the state the right to treat me as such. Please, for your wife and your daughters and your sisters and neices and all the women of child baring age in the state of Tennessee, vote no on this legislation! </p>
<p>SB 1065 by Marrero B (HB 0890 by Hackworth)</p>
<p>AN ACT to amend Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 68, relative to testing for certain substances in pregnant women.<br />
BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF TENNESSEE:<br />
SECTION 1.Tennessee Code Annotated, Title 68, Chapter 5, is amended by adding Section 2 of this act as a new part thereto. </p>
<p>SECTION 2.<br />
(a) The general assembly declares that, as a matter of public policy of this state and in<br />
the interest of public health, pregnant women who abuse alcohol and drugs pose a risk to their unborn children. Pregnant women who meet certain criteria, as determined by the department, through rules and regulations duly promulgated in accordance with the provisions of the Uniform Administrative Procedures Act, compiled in title 4, chapter 5, shall be tested for alcohol and drugs in order to encourage them to seek immediate treatment for an alcohol-related or drug-related problem. </p>
<p>(b) If the department levies a fee or charge for the cost of testing, it shall use the same billing and collection methods normally used by independent private laboratories. Any fee shall be waived for patients who are unable to pay. </p>
<p>(c) The department, in promulgating rules to implement this act, shall consider the following as indications of the necessity for alcohol or drug testing:<br />
(1) No prenatal care;<br />
(2) Late prenatal care after twenty-four (24) weeks gestation;<br />
(3) Incomplete prenatal care;<br />
(4) Abruptio placentae;<br />
(5) Intrauterine fetal death;<br />
(6) Preterm labor of no obvious cause;<br />
(7) Intrauterine growth retardation of no obvious cause;<br />
(8) Previously known alcohol or drug abuse; or<br />
(9) Unexplained congenital anomalies. </p>
<p>(d) The commissioner of health is authorized to adopt rules, using criteria established by the United States department of health and human services as guidelines for modeling the drug and alcohol testing program pursuant to this act, concerning, but not limited to:<br />
(1) Standards for licensing drug and alcohol testing laboratories and suspension and revocation of the licenses;<br />
(2) Body specimens and minimum specimen amounts that are appropriate for drug or alcohol testing;<br />
(3) Methods of analysis and procedures to ensure reliable drug or alcohol testing results, including the use of breathalyzers and standards for initial tests and confirmation tests;<br />
(4) Minimum cut-off detection levels for alcohol, each drug or metabolites of the drug for the purposes of determining a positive test result;<br />
(5) Chain-of-custody procedures to ensure proper identification, labeling and handling of specimens tested; and<br />
(6) Retention, storage and transportation procedures to ensure reliable results on confirmation tests and retests. </p>
<p>(e) Prior to acting on the proposed rules to implement this chapter, the commissioner shall submit the proposed rules to the house health and human resources and the senate general welfare committees of the general assembly for their review and comment. The committees shall have forty-five (45) days to review the proposed rules and transmit any comment it may have to the commissioner. </p>
<p>(f) Any woman who tests positive for alcohol or drugs on a test administered pursuant to this chapter shall be referred to treatment for an alcohol-related or drug-related problem. Every physician, surgeon or other person permitted by law to attend a pregnant woman during gestation shall report each woman who refuses to seek treatment for an alcohol-related or drug-related problem or who misses two (2) or more appointments to the department of children’s services. Such reports shall be in a manner specified by the department, either by contacting a local representative of the department or by utilizing the department’s centralized intake procedure, where applicable. </p>
<p>(g) A health care provider who makes a report of alcohol or drug abuse, as required by subsection (f), shall not be liable in any civil or criminal action that is based solely upon such report. </p>
<p>(h) Nothing in this section shall be construed to confer any immunity upon a health care provider for a criminal or civil action arising out of the treatment of a woman about whom the report of alcohol or drug abuse was made. </p>
<p>(i) All information, interviews, reports, statements, memoranda and drug or alcohol test results, written or otherwise, received by the covered employer through a drug or alcohol testing program are confidential communications and may not be used or received in evidence, obtained in discovery or disclosed in any public or private proceedings, except in accordance with this section. </p>
<p>(j) Laboratories, medical review officers, employee assistance programs, drug or alcohol rehabilitation programs and their agents who receive or have access to information concerning drug or alcohol test results shall keep all information confidential. Release of the information under any other circumstance is authorized solely pursuant to a written consent form signed voluntarily by the person tested, unless the release is compelled by a hearing officer or a court of competent jurisdiction pursuant to an appeal taken under this section, relevant to a legal claim asserted by the employee or is deemed appropriate by a professional or occupational licensing board in a related disciplinary proceeding. The consent form must contain, at a minimum:<br />
(1) The name of the person who is authorized to obtain the information;<br />
(2) The purpose of the disclosure;<br />
(3) The precise information to be disclosed;<br />
(4) The duration of the consent; and<br />
(5) The signature of the person authorizing release of the information. </p>
<p>(k) Information on drug or alcohol test results for tests administered pursuant to this act shall not be released or used in any criminal proceeding against the woman who was subject to the test. Information released contrary to this section is inadmissible as evidence in the criminal proceeding. </p>
<p>SECTION 3. For the purpose of promulgating rules and regulations, this act shall take effect upon becoming a law, the public welfare requiring it. For all other purposes this act shall take effect January 1, 2010, the public welfare requiring it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sarah</title>
		<link>http://mamapundit.com/2009/02/my-blood-it-boils/#comment-339</link>
		<dc:creator>sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 18:53:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mamapundit.com/?p=424#comment-339</guid>
		<description>I feel as if I have just woke up in the twilight zone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel as if I have just woke up in the twilight zone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lynda Jones</title>
		<link>http://mamapundit.com/2009/02/my-blood-it-boils/#comment-295</link>
		<dc:creator>Lynda Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 22:14:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mamapundit.com/?p=424#comment-295</guid>
		<description>OMG? Who is the idiot who proposed this bill? Does HE  know how many clients I have who just cannot afford a doctor?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OMG? Who is the idiot who proposed this bill? Does HE  know how many clients I have who just cannot afford a doctor?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marta rose</title>
		<link>http://mamapundit.com/2009/02/my-blood-it-boils/#comment-294</link>
		<dc:creator>marta rose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 19:53:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mamapundit.com/?p=424#comment-294</guid>
		<description>Katie, I passed this on to my pal (and former student) Radley Balko, and he picked it up on his blog, The Agitator www.theagitator.com.

Scary stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Katie, I passed this on to my pal (and former student) Radley Balko, and he picked it up on his blog, The Agitator <a href="http://www.theagitator.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.theagitator.com</a>.</p>
<p>Scary stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Missybw</title>
		<link>http://mamapundit.com/2009/02/my-blood-it-boils/#comment-293</link>
		<dc:creator>Missybw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 17:03:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mamapundit.com/?p=424#comment-293</guid>
		<description>Thanks Leslie for your research. However, now I would actually be more inclined to wonder whether Sen. Marrero has lost her mind. Because, you know this legislation flies directly in the face of her quote that you posted above. 

Regardless, I feel that this legislation (again while possibly well-intentioned) is trying to cure societal ills via what is actually amounting to punishment for all women who bear (and possibly suffer the tragic loss of) a child in TN. I think we all know that some mothers are only barely entitled to that honorific. And, yes, some mothers abuse drugs and alcohol while they are pregnant.  And let&#039;s go ahead and stipulate that some mothers abuse those substances (and their children thru maltreatment or neglect) after they are born too. The harsh reality of the world we live in is that we are not able to save all children from that fate. In fact, the state systems set up to serve and protect the children born into those situations fail them daily.  Sometimes with horrific results that break all of our hearts.  So, when you consider that reality, how can this legislation that is designed to protect the unborne work?  The only prosecutions will end up being the poorest or most defenseless members of our society, but it will also open the door to abuses of people who first suffer the loss of a child and then suffer the indignity of having to justify why they made the decision to have a glass of wine with dinner.  Furthermore, I will always be against any legislation that crosses the boundary between the Senate chamber and my Doctor&#039;s office. That is not the place of my government, my choices are not yours to make. What I choose is between me and my God, and the TN State Legislature should have no role in that process. So that&#039;s a debate that doesn&#039;t involve labels and hotbutton groups.  My body, my choice. Very simple concept. For me at least.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Leslie for your research. However, now I would actually be more inclined to wonder whether Sen. Marrero has lost her mind. Because, you know this legislation flies directly in the face of her quote that you posted above. </p>
<p>Regardless, I feel that this legislation (again while possibly well-intentioned) is trying to cure societal ills via what is actually amounting to punishment for all women who bear (and possibly suffer the tragic loss of) a child in TN. I think we all know that some mothers are only barely entitled to that honorific. And, yes, some mothers abuse drugs and alcohol while they are pregnant.  And let&#8217;s go ahead and stipulate that some mothers abuse those substances (and their children thru maltreatment or neglect) after they are born too. The harsh reality of the world we live in is that we are not able to save all children from that fate. In fact, the state systems set up to serve and protect the children born into those situations fail them daily.  Sometimes with horrific results that break all of our hearts.  So, when you consider that reality, how can this legislation that is designed to protect the unborne work?  The only prosecutions will end up being the poorest or most defenseless members of our society, but it will also open the door to abuses of people who first suffer the loss of a child and then suffer the indignity of having to justify why they made the decision to have a glass of wine with dinner.  Furthermore, I will always be against any legislation that crosses the boundary between the Senate chamber and my Doctor&#8217;s office. That is not the place of my government, my choices are not yours to make. What I choose is between me and my God, and the TN State Legislature should have no role in that process. So that&#8217;s a debate that doesn&#8217;t involve labels and hotbutton groups.  My body, my choice. Very simple concept. For me at least.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leslie</title>
		<link>http://mamapundit.com/2009/02/my-blood-it-boils/#comment-292</link>
		<dc:creator>Leslie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 16:15:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mamapundit.com/?p=424#comment-292</guid>
		<description>&quot;Sen. Beverly Marrero (D), who voted against the resolution in the committee, said, &#039;This is a flagrant attempt to try to have the government intervene in what should be between a woman and those people that are close to her&#039; (AP/Memphis Daily News, 1/9).&quot;

This is what one of the sponsors of the bill in question had to say regarding her vote against a piece of pro-life legislation.

I found it a little harder to track down info on Mr. Hackworth since he apparently likes to call himself pro-life except in cases of &quot;rape, incest, and the mother&#039;s health,&quot; with the result that he votes with the pro-choice side.  Tennessee Right to Life gave him a big 0 in May 2008 for voting against every pro-life bill they supported.

So can we at least have an honest debate here and quit blaming Republicans, conservatives, pro-lifers, or the religious right for this bill that you don&#039;t like?  Do you think it&#039;s possible that the fact that Democrats who are usually (in my opinion, and yours too I assume) on the right side, have sponsored this bill demonstrates the ambivalence many have regarding unborn life:  either ours to take at will or ours to protect at all costs, all depending on whether its mother wants it to live or not?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Sen. Beverly Marrero (D), who voted against the resolution in the committee, said, &#8216;This is a flagrant attempt to try to have the government intervene in what should be between a woman and those people that are close to her&#8217; (AP/Memphis Daily News, 1/9).&#8221;</p>
<p>This is what one of the sponsors of the bill in question had to say regarding her vote against a piece of pro-life legislation.</p>
<p>I found it a little harder to track down info on Mr. Hackworth since he apparently likes to call himself pro-life except in cases of &#8220;rape, incest, and the mother&#8217;s health,&#8221; with the result that he votes with the pro-choice side.  Tennessee Right to Life gave him a big 0 in May 2008 for voting against every pro-life bill they supported.</p>
<p>So can we at least have an honest debate here and quit blaming Republicans, conservatives, pro-lifers, or the religious right for this bill that you don&#8217;t like?  Do you think it&#8217;s possible that the fact that Democrats who are usually (in my opinion, and yours too I assume) on the right side, have sponsored this bill demonstrates the ambivalence many have regarding unborn life:  either ours to take at will or ours to protect at all costs, all depending on whether its mother wants it to live or not?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: benintn</title>
		<link>http://mamapundit.com/2009/02/my-blood-it-boils/#comment-290</link>
		<dc:creator>benintn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 15:56:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mamapundit.com/?p=424#comment-290</guid>
		<description>I posted a letter to Sen. Marrero here: http://nashvillecommunityorganizers.ning.com/profiles/blogs/an-open-letter-to-sen-marrero</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I posted a letter to Sen. Marrero here: <a href="http://nashvillecommunityorganizers.ning.com/profiles/blogs/an-open-letter-to-sen-marrero" rel="nofollow">http://nashvillecommunityorganizers.ning.com/profiles/blogs/an-open-letter-to-sen-marrero</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leslie</title>
		<link>http://mamapundit.com/2009/02/my-blood-it-boils/#comment-289</link>
		<dc:creator>Leslie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 15:51:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mamapundit.com/?p=424#comment-289</guid>
		<description>I know there are pro-life Democrats since I happen to be one.  I would like to see some evidence that the pro-life lobby has its fingerprints on this bill.  What is the voting record of these legislators on abortion issues?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know there are pro-life Democrats since I happen to be one.  I would like to see some evidence that the pro-life lobby has its fingerprints on this bill.  What is the voting record of these legislators on abortion issues?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: benintn</title>
		<link>http://mamapundit.com/2009/02/my-blood-it-boils/#comment-288</link>
		<dc:creator>benintn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 15:33:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mamapundit.com/?p=424#comment-288</guid>
		<description>The only people this will benefit are the drug-testing companies.  This is a horribly written law.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only people this will benefit are the drug-testing companies.  This is a horribly written law.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Missybw</title>
		<link>http://mamapundit.com/2009/02/my-blood-it-boils/#comment-287</link>
		<dc:creator>Missybw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 15:15:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mamapundit.com/?p=424#comment-287</guid>
		<description>To be very clear, the Republican party does not have exclusive ownership of the Pro-Life
movement.  While the bulk of the movement has tied themselves to that party, there are
also many Democrats who also call themselves Pro-Life.  This legislation, while possibly
based upon good intentions, is what I consider yet another tool in that Pro-Life/
Anti-Woman agenda and even if the movement is publicly not attached, you can be sure that their fingerprints are all over this junk legislation.  And the punishment of all women, regardless of status or class, if they
do not care for themselves based upon how the state says they should, is a direct slap in
the face to every woman, regardless of reproductive status. That women, and Democrat women
at that, allowed themselves to be led down this path in the interest of engineering a 
cure for social ills at least partly caused by poverty and poor education is the saddest
part of all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be very clear, the Republican party does not have exclusive ownership of the Pro-Life<br />
movement.  While the bulk of the movement has tied themselves to that party, there are<br />
also many Democrats who also call themselves Pro-Life.  This legislation, while possibly<br />
based upon good intentions, is what I consider yet another tool in that Pro-Life/<br />
Anti-Woman agenda and even if the movement is publicly not attached, you can be sure that their fingerprints are all over this junk legislation.  And the punishment of all women, regardless of status or class, if they<br />
do not care for themselves based upon how the state says they should, is a direct slap in<br />
the face to every woman, regardless of reproductive status. That women, and Democrat women<br />
at that, allowed themselves to be led down this path in the interest of engineering a<br />
cure for social ills at least partly caused by poverty and poor education is the saddest<br />
part of all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
