web analytics
 

I just finished reading Sarah Palin’s tome, Going Rogue – the whole thing. I’ve picked it up a few times before, but this weekend I actually read the entire book for the first time.

Given that I disagree with Governor Palin quite strongly on a wide variety of social and political issues, I tried very hard to read the book with an open mind. After all, there are plenty of people – both in politics and out – with whom I strongly disagree on the issues but whom I admire otherwise because they are wildly clever or very sincere – or even because they’re just damn funny. So I figured that perhaps in reading Palin’s own telling of her own story – unfiltered through the liberal, elitist, atheist press she so disdains – I would find some of these admirable qualities in Governor Palin.

Ummmmm….no.

While I have little doubt after reading the book that Palin and her husband would make fun drinking buddies, I didn’t come away from the book with my general opinion of her intellect or capacity for public service much improved. In fact, I’d say I feel even less inclined to be comfortable with the idea of seeing her serve in national political office than I did before I read her book. It probably didn’t help that the last humongous political autobiography I’d finished was Teddy Kennedy’s True Compass.

It doesn’t matter what you think of Teddy Kennedy’s politics, there’s no way you could read his memoir without coming away impressed with the thoughtful, deliberative, self-reflective approach he took in recounting his own life experiences. He owns his mistakes – and there were many – and he continually strives to better understand his own failings. He never claims to hold the absolute truth on any matter, but always seeks to create a thoughtful, American-style dialogue in which the best ideas rise to the top because they work. And while Kennedy’s politics were always liberal, he was also a master statesman, bringing all kinds of stakeholders together to craft legislation that could actually get passed, and making good friends from both sides of the aisle along the way.

But Palin’s book is the polar opposite of Kennedy’s. She seems to blame everyone but herself for any screw-ups she’s experienced; among those she says have caused her problems in her exceedingly brief national career thus far have been political opponents, the media, cunning McCain campaign aides who are out to get her, and a large number of Americans whom she repeatedly describes as elitists who aren’t REALLY Americans in the true sense of the word. In the book, Palin never truly owns any of her missteps, and she seems to believe that her aw-shucks, downhome lifestyle back in Alaska offers the same value to a national electorate as being highly experienced and well-educated in complex domestic policy issues and international affairs.

Last, while I can certainly appreciate the value of a strong spiritual faith in offering decision-making guidance to those serving in public office, I don’t think it should be substituted for contemplative thinking or deliberative process. While Kennedy is a devout Catholic, his faith seemed to compel him to think more deeply and to consider issues in a fuller, more complex way before coming to his conclusions. In Palin’s case, however, she seems to use her evangelical Christian worldview as a fixed template that she lays atop all issues and questions that come before her. She seems perversely proud of the fact that because her Christian faith is so solid and immutable, she already knows what her position will be on any issue with which she’s faced before she even informs herself of the details.

The book was modestly entertaining. She’s clearly devoted to her husband and kids, and her tales of modern family life in Alaska were occasionally humorous. But overall, the book left me more concerned about the (still remote) possibility of a Sarah Palin White House than I was before I read it. Even if I might enjoy grilling out with Todd, Sarah and the kids, I can’t muster the same enthusiasm for the idea of this woman ever having access to the nuclear football.

 

Today is my gorgeous, amazing, supersmart, kind and sensitive daughter J’s 15th birthday. She is everything I ever could have hoped for in a daughter, and I love getting to be her mama.

Happy birthday sweetie!

janeheather2

Every year on Jane’s birthday, I republish this essay, below, which I wrote when she was a toddler (and which was published in this anthology in 2007). Every year, when I read it again, I am reminded of what might have been, and of how much I struggled with my decision. I feel profoundly grateful that I made the choice I did, but also profoundly grateful that I am raising Jane, and now her two younger sisters, in a country where the choice was MINE to make.

———————
THE DECISION

By Katie Allison Granju (all rights reserved)

I began to suspect that something was very wrong the day I could no longer walk across the library at the law school where I was a first year student. Ten weeks pregnant, I had been fighting excessive fatigue, loss of appetite and night sweats for almost a month.

“Relax,” my midwife told me. “You’re just having a rough first trimester.”

I was inclined to believe her. At age 27 and in perfect health, I had no reason to consider that anything more than extreme morning sickness was plaguing me, and that was no big deal. Heck, with my first pregnancy, three years previously, I had felt so good that I had even wished for a little first-trimester yukkiness so that I could feel “really pregnant.”

Still, the nagging feeling that something other than just the pregnancy was going on grew stronger with each wretched day. The afternoon when I found myself collapsed in a chair in the law library brought the situation to a head. A classmate had to practically carry me to her car so that she could drive me home. There, she insisted on taking my temperature: 104′.

Within hours, I was admitted to the maternity floor at a local hospital, where I spent the next eight unhappy days. Each afternoon, just to make sure that all was well, the obstetrician would perform an ultrasound, showing us the tiny “beep, beep” of the fetal heart and the jerky movements of a glowing human jumping bean. We began calling the baby “Peanut.” My doctor was puzzled as test after test failed to determine what the cause of my illness could be. He brought in an infectious disease specialist, who tested me for everything from HIV to Malaria.

On the sixth day of my confinement, as I was lying miserably in my hospital bed, watching a rerun of the Andy Griffith show, both of my doctors suddenly entered my room, closed the door and turned off the TV without asking. Now I knew for certain that I had been right; something was terribly wrong.

They had come to inform me that I had an acute, primary cytomegolovirus infection, popularly known as CMV. The disease is not generally something to worry about….unless you are immunocompromised, which I wasn’t….or pregnant, which I was. CMV, we were told by the obstetrician, is very dangerous to a fetus, particularly in the first trimester. It is a leading cause of congenital neurologic impairment, severe physical anomalies, devastating mental retardation and infant fatality. Really, we were told, we should consider our “options”.

Suddenly, I, a person with all her grandparents still alive, a person who had never even been to a funeral, was faced with death. Not only was I faced with death in the abstract, I was faced with The Decision. In consultation with my with my sweet, 26 year old husband, a man similarly unschooled in the ways of mortality, I was charged with handing down a judgment as to whether Peanut would continue to leap and hop about in my womb and ultimately, be born alive. With a somber face, the doctor uttered the words that were to become so familiar to us over the next weeks, “Now, no one can make this decision for you. Only you can decide.”

Only, I couldn’t. Not without more information. And maybe not even then. We immediately became experts on CMV and its potential sequelae. I stayed up all night for days after the diagnosis, reading medical literature and searching the World Wide Web for answers. None was forthcoming. The best information available told us that if we carried the pregnancy to term, there was approximately a 1 in 4 chance that an infected baby would be affected by the CMV in some way. I was paralyzed with grief and indecision.

As an ostensibly pro-choice woman, I realized that I was not actually “pro”- anyone ever having to make a choice like this. Although no one wanted to offer an opinion as to what we should do, everyone had an angle. My doctor answered my questions honestly and told me that if his wife or daughter were faced with a CMV diagnosis in the first trimester, he would definitely encourage an abortion.

The minister whom a friend sent to see me was gentle and kind. Yet, she assumed that I was crying because I had already made the obvious decision to have an abortion and was grieving. She offered to set a time for a memorial service after the abortion to “celebrate and remember”. She even showed me the feminist liturgy she had photocopied for just such an occasion. I found her point of view strangely repulsive and without intellectual honesty. If the life I would be taking was worthy of religious remembrance and ceremony, how was it possibly mine to take? There are no memorial services for appendectomies or squashed bugs. Only for people.

I was hesitant to share my dilemma with a certain close relative because I feared her unbending anti-abortion stance. Of course, she immediately realized the decision with which I was faced after someone told her of my diagnosis. She telephoned me to instruct me that, although abortion is wrong, sometimes God realizes that the time is not right for a particular soul to come into this world. Considering the circumstances, she opined, no one could blame me for whatever decision I felt was right. Her stunning hypocrisy angered me. Despite her stated views, she was conveniently able to allow for choice in this issue when the woman in question was someone she loved.

As days passed and I wrestled with my conscience, I realized that I was petrified of the physical procedure itself. My doctor assured me that he could perform the abortion at the hospital. I wouldn’t have to go sit in a waiting room at a clinic. I told him that, although I realized that most first and early second trimester abortions are performed under local anesthesia, the only way I could face this would be knocked out cold. He agreed. I knew that I could be admitted to the hospital, drift gently off to sleep and wake up, relieved of this problem forever. I would never have to think about it again if I chose not to. Variously, this sounded tremendously appealing and completely horrifying.

When I envisioned the actual opening of my womb and suctioning of its contents, the same primal instinct kicked in that would allow me to single-handedly rip the lungs out of any man who laid a hand on my little boy. What kind of terrible mother would allow her defenseless offspring to be taken from the very bosom of maternal safety and warmth? I felt sick, and wept yet again.

My father tried to reason with me, pointing out the lifelong ramifications of my decision. He was terribly worried that I would be forever shackled to the responsibilities of caring for a severely ill or disabled child. He fretted that his big plans for his own child would be sucked away forever by a draining responsibility from which I could never escape. I too was seized with these fears. I secretly believed that I simply wasn’t up to the task of mothering a child with serious health and developmental problems. What would that do to our other child, whom I already knew and loved? What would it do to my career goals? Our marriage? And what about the baby? The thought of seeing our tiny baby, suffering, perhaps hooked up to tubes and wires in a neonatal intensive care unit, caused me almost unbearable psychic pain. I imagined a future in which our mentally retarded and physically handicapped 13 year old child would endure the cruel taunts of other teenagers.

I began to wonder if I was being selfish in even considering giving birth to this baby. Would anyone choose for herself the life that this child might face? Were my own fears about a relatively minor surgery and future guilt good enough reasons to bring forth a human being who would have to live with the consequences of my own cowardice? I tentatively decided that motherhood is full of tough calls and hard decisions, both in the name of love and in a child’s best interests. This must be one of them, I thought. I would do what was best for all concerned.

I telephoned the hospital, as instructed by my physician, and weakly scheduled the procedure for the next day. The admitting clerk who took the call easily misunderstood my vague instructions and thought that I was coming in for labor induction of a full-term, healthy pregnancy. “Congratulations,” she said brightly. I corrected her mistake and her tone grew dark, almost menacing. She told me to meet my doctor at the labor and delivery wing at 6:30 a.m. sharp the following morning. She abruptly hung up.

There, I thought to myself. I have done the right thing. No turning back. I felt like someone had drained all the life from me. I sat in a darkened room for the next several hours, absently rubbing my still flat belly and murmuring maternal expressions of comfort to no one in particular. Later that evening, my husband and I discussed the choice that had been made. I attempted stoicism. He reminded me that we had a friend coming over to bring us supper, as many kind people had done throughout my illness and convalescence at home. I roused myself enough to get dressed and out of bed.

Our friend arrived and we all ate supper together. I told her of my decision and the reasons behind it. She listened quietly and then asked if she could tell us a little about her brother, who had died recently at the age of nine. She recounted a tale of extraordinary courage on the part of her parents, her sister, herself, and especially, on the part of a little boy with Down Syndrome named David. This child and this family had lived through all of the things I feared when I considered birthing my own baby, including David’s eventual early death. Still, the joy and love of his brief existence canceled out all of the pain, fear and hurt. No one who knew David had any regrets. Our friend showed us his photograph: a beautiful and smiling tow-headed little boy, obviously mentally retarded.

Neither do I have any regrets about the decisions I made after that discussion. I never arrived at the hospital the next morning. I canceled the abortion and after a pregnancy alternating between exhilaration and despair, gave birth to my daughter, Elizabeth Jane Chevillard Granju on August 15th, 1995. She was born ten days early weighing 6 pounds and eleven ounces. She was born infected with congenital cytomegolovirus and had two seizure episodes in her first year. Since that time, however, she has been physically and developmentally normal in every way. She is also a strikingly beautiful child, with shiny dark hair, olive skin and a lithe, elfin figure.

Jane’s epilepsy could conceivably worsen and she is at risk for other neurologic problems and progressive hearing loss until she leaves childhood behind. Still, she is remarkably healthy. Many people want to extract a moral from this story. Pro-life friends tell me that Jane is my gift from God for making the right choice. They want to hold my baby up as their own personal anti-abortion poster child.

Those who are pro-choice attempt to use the tale as a cautionary parable for why choice should be the focus of the debate, rather than abortion itself. After all, I was able to carefully consider each of my options and ultimately, have the final say. This wouldn’t have been possible in another political context. My own views have become less reactionary and more cognizant of the complexity of the abortion issue. I continue to fear the slippery slope that we head down when we deny women the right to choose when and how we bear children. On the other hand, I no longer attempt to repudiate the fact that the graphic posters displayed by anti-abortion activists are real photographs of what really comes out of the uterus during an abortion. Many abortions do indeed “stop a beating heart,” as the bumper sticker says.

However, I will not allow Jane to be used as a crucible for the views of any person or group. I know that I would love Jane just as much if she had been born severely disabled. I do not, however, deny the relief I feel that she is so radiantly well. I am deeply aware that I was graced with this experience, which has allowed me to see that the blessing is sometimes as much in the struggle, from which I have learned so much, as in the outcome.

COPYRIGHT KATIE ALLISON GRANJU – ALL RIGHTS RESERVED
——————————

 

Several people drew my attention this week to a rather bizarre opinion-slash-feature piece in the New York Times in which writer Liesl Schillinger attempts to shoehorn a painfully forced parallel among Sarah Palin, Michelle Bachmann and Nancy Pelosi based solely on the fact that all three of them happen to be mothers to five children….just like me (!!!).

…the three belong to what may be the smallest, most exclusive clique in American politics. The admission requirements are beyond most women, and all men: members must be prominent players in the United States political arena and must have given birth to not one, not two, not three, not even four — but five children, something that presumably gives them more in common than they might like to admit.

What does it say about this country at this moment that, of the small handful of women who have achieved highly visible political roles, three are matriarchs of such very large families? Could it be that the skills of managing sprawling households translate well into holding office? Or that such a remarkable glut of mom cred makes a woman’s bid for external power more palatable to voters? Or are they just related to more voters, which translates into a mysterious edge at the polls?

Whatever forces may be at play, taking a look at present dynamics, any American woman with long-range political ambitions might do well to also look to her nursery.


This story is what I’m blogging about over at Babble today.

 

I was sad to read tonight that Jody Powell died of a heart attack. And I was surprised to learn that Mr. Powell, the White House Press Secretary under President Jimmy Carter who went on to become one of the partners in powerhouse Beltway PR firm Powell and Tate ( the “Tate” is Sheila Tate, Nancy Reagan’s former press secretary) was only 65 years old when he passed away today. That means he was only in his mid 30s when he came to DC from Georgia and braved, then won over the aggressive White House Press Corps of that era.

Powell

By all public accounts, Mr. Powell was a truly nice man, and I believe it, because he was awfully nice to me.

In 1978, I was a budding news and political junkie living in Bell Buckle, TN. While other little girls in my elementary school class were playing with Barbie Dream House, or experimenting with their mother’s set of Clairol hot rollers, I was more likely to be sitting in a tree in the backyard re-reading about the exploits of Woodward and Bernstein, or maybe flipping through the pages of “The Boys on the Bus.”

During that particular stretch of my childhood, we were allowed to watch some TV (for long periods here and there, when my parents would decide my little brother and sister and I weren’t reading or playing outside enough, we had a TV-free house). I particularly loved the smart, literate Saturday morning news pieces for kids that CBS ran between cartoons, reported by Christopher Glenn.

In these Saturday morning pieces, and on the evening network news, I loved seeing Jody Powell do his job, explaining President Carter’s policies. In our household full of Democrats, with two parents who were journalists, Mr. Powell’s job looked just ideal to me. I didn’t know whether there had ever been a girl White House press secretary (there had not, and would not be for another 14 years, when Dee Dee Myers finally broke that barrier), but I figured I’d aim to be the first.

So I wrote Mr. Powell a rather lengthy letter on the special, new stationery I had gotten for Christmas, the flowery blue paper with my name and address printed at the top. In the letter, I explained to him how I thought that being White House Press Secretary looked far more interesting than being President, and I explained how I intended to be the first girl to land the job. I also asked him whether Amy Carter – who, like me, appeared to be a bookish 10 year old girl with really bad glasses – liked living in the White House.

My parents gently cautioned me that the very busy Mr. Powell might not have time to respond to my earnest letter, but he did, telling me that he appreciated my letter, and that he hoped I would aim even higher than being White House press secretary. And included with his response was an autographed, 8 by 10 photo of Amy Carter, playing with her cat.

cartercat

I cannot tell you how excited I was to receive this letter. And the photo of Amy and her cat hung on my bedroom wall until it was finally replaced with a poster of Duran Duran.

I think the letter and photo may still be tucked away in a drawer at my parents’ house, along with some other treasured autographs I collected as a child, including Miss Lillian, The Fonz, and both Ponch and John from CHIPs.

Godspeed, Mr. Powell. And condolences to the Powell family on their loss.

 

In my latest blog post over at Babble. I’m talking about how I’ve gotten way more comfortable over time in laying down the law when it comes to what my tween and teen children can and cannot wear in public.


Teenagers are trying to find and express their identities through their clothing. I get that, and they need some freedom to do play around with who they are through their sartorial excesses. That shape-shifting through fashion experimentation can be an important part of the growing up process, and completely harmless. On the other hand, when the identity teenegers are expressing through what they are wearing is one that truly contradicts your values as a parent, or celebrates things that are dangerous or illegal, or that compromises their reputation among other kids and adults because it says something about them that people find negative, well, then, I think parental discretion and judgment trumps their need or right to have complete freedom of choice in what they wear. That’s where I am with this these days, but that’s been an evolution over time.

For some teenagers, dressing a certain way is nothing more than play acting, but for other kids, adopting, for example, a Goth fashion sensibility actually supports and encourages their descent into depression or drug use or other kinds of self-harm. Dressing like the guys in gangsta rap videos might be a big nothing for some kids, who just like to play around with costuming themselves, while for others, it’s part of a very meaningful and dangerous interest in a criminal lifestyle. And even if the kids themselves aren’t actually doing any of the things commonly associated with whatever specific clothing styles they are sporting, they can be creating an impression in their schools, neighborhoods and communities that is unhealthy and self-defeating. As parents, we have to protect our kids’ from their own lack of experience and underdeveloped judgment unti l they “get” this stuff themselves.

Go read the whole thing and tell me what you think in the comments there.

 

It has come to my attention that infant formula ads are occasionally showing up in my BlogHer adspace, over there to your left. I’ve never actually seen this, but I am told that it’s happening.

I am working on making sure that it stops happening ASAP. In the meantime, please accept my apologies. As I hope anyone who has followed my writing knows, I am a longtime, vocal supporter of The WHO Code , and I would never willingly have such an ad on any site I own or oversee.

So, yeah, I am working on this issue. Bear with me. And thanks to those readers who have alerted me to the problem.

And also, for the record, I sure wish that the PR and marketing firms that send me pitches, asking me to review or promote their client’s products on this blog would at least take a quick look-see at the contents and general editorial themes here before hitting send. If they did, they wouldn’t waste their time, their clients’ money or my email inbox space asking me to blog about things like a great new brand of infant formula or their client’s revolutionary, abstinence-based sex-ed program for teenagers…

—————–

FOLLOW KATIE’S BLOGGING ON TWITTER OR FACEBOOK/ READ HOME/WORK, KATIE’S BLOG AT BABBLE.com

© 2011 mamapundit
FM Living
Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha